Pre-announcing Transhumanism 2024

This is not yet an announcement. It’s definitely not a press release. Not yet, anyway.

But it’s a call for feedback on a potential multi-year campaign.

Image credit: this picture includes a photograph by Pixabay user BazzaBoy.

Provisionally, the campaign has the name “Transhumanism 2024”.

It envisions candidates representing Transhumanist UK standing in mayoral elections in the UK in May 2024 – in cities such as London and Greater Manchester, and potentially others too.

The idea is that, between now and these elections, Transhumanist UK will develop and highlight a memorable, compelling set of political policies in support of our vision for a radically better human society.

We’ll need some powerful slogans that distinguish us from other political initiatives. For example, as in the image shown above, “Steering technology for profound social progress”. (Other suggestions are welcome!)

We’ll also need a number of clear, concise policy proposals. Some examples are given below. Evidently, more work is needed here.

If the campaign is successful, these slogans and policy proposals will increasingly enter the main political discussion over the next three years, via the influence of Transhumanist UK.

Toward transhumanist mayors

Why focus on city mayoral elections? Because these elections take place under a “supplementary vote” system, in which voters can indicate both first and second preferences for candidates. That will make it easier for voters to cast their votes for us.

More details: Supplementary vote is different from the “first past the post system” (FPTP) that is used in the UK’s parliamentary elections. In FPTP, each voter has only a single vote. Voters are often reluctant to give their votes to minor party candidates (e.g. Candidate M), worrying that their vote would be wasted, and that it might allow a candidate they really dislike (Candidate RD, say) to beat another candidate they would quite like to win (Candidate QL, say). With supplementary vote, the voter can give their first vote to M and their second to QL. But in FPTP, most such voters would just vote for QL, despite their level of interest in M.

Next steps with the campaign

Here’s what could happen next:

  1. An initial set of possible policy proposals is presented (see below)
  2. The set is improved, iteratively, via online feedback
  3. An online meeting, perhaps late in July, helps to focus minds
  4. Material is prepared for a public launch of the campaign
  5. The public launch takes place
  6. Things take off from here!
  7. Things become more and more serious…

Possible policy proposals

The following proposals:

1. Healthcare that keeps citizens healthy

Significantly more funding should be provided to develop and deploy treatments that keep bodies and minds youthful and vigorous, catching illnesses early and undoing the damage of aging. In this vision, people will be as healthy and as engaged in all aspects of life at the age of 90 as when aged 40. This will make the longevity dividend real.

2. Liberalise access to psychoactive substances

Laws banning the use of nootropic drugs in the UK are ill-informed and are overdue revision. These compounds, when used with due guidance and supervision, can boost many aspects of mental vitality.

3. Embrace genetic editing

Techniques such as CRISPR have the potential to edit human genomes to remove causes of rare genetic diseases and to enable other improvements. Viable applications should be explored promptly and, when found safe, legislative barriers against their use should be removed.

4. A city that flourishes whilst being carbon neutral

The city should accelerate taking wide advantage of next generation green technologies. In this way, buildings and transport systems will provide higher qualities of life at the same time as avoiding any net negative impact on the environment.

5. Incentivise meat from non-sentient sources

Incentives should be provided for people to switch their diets away from meat from slaughtered animals. Meat that is cultured in labs should be preferred: it’s healthier, better for the environment, and avoids killing any sentient animals.

6. From GDP to IHSF

Instead of measuring and trying to improve GDP – the total financial value of goods exchanged – politicians should switch to defining, measuring, and improving IHSF – the Index of Human and Social Flourishing (name subject to change). The IHSF should increase as the requirements for a good quality of life reduce in cost; it should fall when more citizens feel they are being “left behind” against their will.

7. A smart city with trusted technology

The technology systems that sense and monitor what is happening throughout the city should prioritise openness and fairness, in ways that deliver clear benefit to citizens, and can gain everyone’s trust. Legitimate privacy concerns will be respected, whilst instances of crime and terrorism can be reduced.

8. Automation that uplifts rather than deprives

Automation should be welcomed wherever it makes lives safer, reduces work that is back-breaking or soul-destroying, and enables key goods and services to be provided at lower costs. The social safety net should be reconfigured to avoid victimising people who lose their jobs as a result of automation.

9. Local superdemocracy

Vibrant citizens’ assemblies (or other similar groupings), aided by transparent AI systems, can accelerate reaching deep agreement on the best ideas from anywhere inside the city. In this way, local politics will feature less partisanship and more constructive collaboration.

10. A champion of the transhumanist revolution

The city should be attractive to the innovators who are building the technology that enables substantial improvements in the human condition. Particular support should be provided for those innovators who prioritise safety as well as positive impact.

11. Steer the singularity

The city needs to anticipate the possibility of a sudden acceleration in the power of AI, and to take action to steer any such development in a beneficial direction.

12. The human right to cryonic preservation

Citizens should be supported if they express a desire for the cryonic preservation of their body on the point of legal death.

13. Education fit for the new future

Revisions in education systems should help citizens of all ages to prepare to handle the risks and take advantage of the opportunities of a society that:

  1. Is changing rapidly, in ways that are difficult to anticipate
  2. Is ultra-diverse – with a growing variety of transhumans and AIs
  3. Is awash with irrationality and destructive tendencies
  4. Has lost its confidence in traditional moral principles
  5. Is approaching a state of “post-scarcity”, characterised by abundance
  6. Is approaching a state of “post-work”.

Footnote

A couple of issues will need attention.

First, the UK Home Secretary, Priti Patel, has declared an intent that the mayoral elections in 2024 will be held under FPTP rather than Supplementary Vote. The announcement has generated considerable controversy.

Second, candidates for mayors in these elections need to submit a deposit of UKP £10,000. That will require Transhumanist UK to raise an order of magnitude more funds than before.

Feedback requested

Please let Transhumanist UK know if you:

  • Want to become involved in the Transhumanism 2024 campaign
  • Have views on possible slogans or policy proposals
  • Have ideas about ways of gaining early public impact from the campaign (well ahead of 2024)
  • Have any other feedback on this proposal.

Thanks!

Published on 30 June 2021.

One thought on “Pre-announcing Transhumanism 2024

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: